• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    You can remove a king, but can you remove the concept of a single person ruling over a territory?

    Kim Jong Un isn’t a king, but he is a single individual ruling over North Korea. Putin isn’t a king, but he has the powers of one. Then there are examples from history like the Roman Republic, and the Weimar Republic.

    IMO governments are basically a hierarchy where if things become “stable” enough, you can replace one with another one higher up the hierarchy. But, without work, they’ll eventually collapse into something lower down the hierarchy.

    At the bottom of the hierarchy you have violent anarchy, where nobody is in charge and various groups are all vying for power. If things become stable enough, one powerful person (or small group (often headed by one person)) can take charge, and you get an autocratic / dictatorship type system. If the dictator is removed, you will often descend back into violent anarchy. But, if things get stable enough, sometimes you can replace that dictator with a kind of republic, either something like a constitutional monarchy, or a democratic republic. The former dictator might become a figurehead while power is held by a medium sized group who is elected by the public. If you don’t take care, that kind of system can devolve into an autocratic one, where one person holds absolute power. You might still have elections, but they don’t really change anything.

    So, even though the “divine right of kings” is mostly gone, that was just window dressing on an autocratic system. And, we can easily get back to that kind of a system now. In fact, many supposedly democratic places are backsliding towards that right now.

    P.S. I think there’s probably other forms of government higher up the hierarchy than democratic republics / constitutional monarchies. We should be trying to get there, instead of assuming that a democratic republic is the best possible system in the world. But, at the same time, we need to guard against allowing a democratic system to backslide into becoming an autocracy.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Kim Jong Un is definitely a king, whatever he calls himself.

      He’s the hereditary ruler of a state that maintains its grip with the personal loyalty of the military.