• mughaloid@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    its a wrong theory and ahistorical. Religious tensions was there and it will be for many years to come. Religion brings problems and anti materialism which is a false consciousness

      • mughaloid@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        USSR was very successful in their attempts. I recently watched a video from Uzbekistan in 1970s there was neither islamic fundamentalism or closures of mosques. Don’t iterate the liberal propaganda that campaign against religion was a failure in USSR. The return happened due to the capitalism and chauvinists in every region of ex USSR states.

      • mughaloid@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bro there was saint Kabir, Meera, sufis etc. In their poems they always had written about the animosity and hatred between hindus and Muslims. British just sparked the tension in 20th century by aligning themselves with Hindus and Muslim fundamentalists. But obviously the partition was inevitable. There was either of the chauvinism, it’s Islamic supremacist or Hindus. It was just a good moment in history of India that Nehru was socialist and secular oriented. Even his colleagues were pro hindu chauvinists like Sardar Patel and etc.