Exman tells PopSci that, even with ChatGPT’s deficiencies, administrators believe the tool remains the simplest way to legally comply with new legislation.

I mean it’s certainly simpler to do things incorrectly. Can’t argue with this logic

How to be paranoid and lazy as fuck at the same time.

Broke: republican book banning

Woke: don’t ban books

Roke(o): On one hand I am a fan of regressive content bans, but allowing ChatGPT to decide which books get banned is how we get the basilisk!!!

@blakestacey “Each of [the titles of] these texts was reviewed using AI software”