• 200fifty@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exman tells PopSci that, even with ChatGPT’s deficiencies, administrators believe the tool remains the simplest way to legally comply with new legislation.

    I mean it’s certainly simpler to do things incorrectly. Can’t argue with this logic

  • swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Broke: republican book banning

    Woke: don’t ban books

    Roke(o): On one hand I am a fan of regressive content bans, but allowing ChatGPT to decide which books get banned is how we get the basilisk!!!