CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.comexternal-linkmessage-square195fedilinkarrow-up1266arrow-down1124
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.comCombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square195fedilink
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down6·10 months agoPersonally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
minus-squarejerkface@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·10 months agoIt costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
minus-squareduffman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·10 months agoYou just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
minus-squarejerkface@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-210 months agoDude. Fucking context: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights
Personally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
It costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
You just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
Dude. Fucking context: