• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Okay, but:

    • that can change at any time if Valve bothers to patch it
    • it’s technically piracy
    • it takes effort the average person isn’t going to do

    DRM-free avoids that, hence why GOG has value.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      that can change at any time if Valve bothers to patch it

      Sure. And DRM free can become DRM laden with a patch too

      it’s technically piracy

      No it’s not. It doesn’t even legally count as copyright infringement. You are legally allowed to crack your own legit copy of software. The only thing possibly in the way is the EULA of the software (almost all of them have a possibly-illegal no reverse engineering clause)

      it takes effort the average person isn’t going to do

      The average person isn’t going to be backing up their games in the first place.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        DRM free can become DRM laden with a patch

        Only if you download the update for that game.

        The patch to the Steam DLL could impact every game, and it still requires the user to patch the binary. Steam updating the binary to patch out the fix has a much bigger impact than a game adding DRM later.

        You are legally allowed to crack your own copy

        I’m pretty sure you’re not, though there’s potential for some gray area. Here’s 17 U.S. Code § 1201, (a) (1) (A):

        No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

        And yes, the average person does “back up” their games by having a copy of the installer in a Downloads directory or maybe a separate drive. They’re probably not going to use a NAS or cloud service, but that’s probably still more likely than applying a patch to a binary.