• Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Many chromium browsera already have inbuilt adblockers that aren’t extensions, so they won’t be affected by MV3.

    OTOH, MV3 versions of uBO and AdGuard are already more than enough for 99.9% of people.

    So no, nothing will change.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      have inbuilt adblockers that aren’t extensions

      yeah but they are way less powerful than uBlock Origin. I tried Brave, just out of curiosity, and shields is a crippled uBO.

      • Aatube@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Try uBO Lite, which is official and MV3. It is very much good enough, it’s just the edges and user-defined filters that aren’t covered. Adblocking possibilities in MV3 have improved a lot, though they obviously still aren’t par and could probably never be par with MV2

        • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          user-defined filters

          that’s what makes uBO better than any other adblocker. I’m not surprised Google wanted to get rid of it.

          I’ll stick to Firefox based browsers.

          • Aatube@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m pretty sure ABP also had user-defined filters… I strongly disagree that user defined filters out of all things that makes uBO better. It’s the dedicated filter team, the advanced filter syntax, the memory consumption, the uWall integration…