• fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hypothetically I want to secure my home with Cameras…

    What’s the best way to do this? OSS preferably.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      So, just an FYI, I bought Eufy cameras because I believed their marketing bullshit about being secure and end-to-end encrypted. About two months later they changed how they describe their security and quietly modified their privacy policy. Turns out they’re not really end-to-end encrypted and it is possible to gain access to the streams sometimes.

      My recommendation, after doing my research is not to buy anything that is able to be viewed remotely. Buy something that stores the video locally, in your home. If possible, buy and install wired cameras.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The most important thing is just to have cameras that are positioned to watch you in bed.

    • vpklotar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m just about to setup TP-link cameras connected to Frigate (NVR software) with a Coral TPU for offline object detection. This means I can block access to internet for the cameras and use a VPN home if I want to watch them.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Onvif camera (It’s the standard. Any camera that supports onvif will be plug and play). Block the cameras’ Mac addresses at your router so they can’t get out directly. Install zoneminder on Linux. If you need remote access follow all the guides to securing a Linux server that has ports open to the Internet. (Ssl, tailscale etc.)

      Blueiris for Windows is great but it’s not open source.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      No-internet cameras hooked up to local storage.

      For remote access, you could use whatever you want to use for remotely accessing local files.

      • WetAndFlummoxed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Didn’t they just have a security incident where people could access other people’s full unifi account including devices?

        • Empyreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Correct but that’s only if you enable the remote connection through ubiquity, if you have that turned off its all local.

          • WetAndFlummoxed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ah, I wasn’t aware there was an option to keep it local. Does that keep your entire site from being remote manageable or just the camera system?

        • lama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The security issue you mentioned I think only affected when they handle access to the cameras. I think you can set up a VPN and then turn off remote access on the NVR, so it seems possible to avoid that issue.

          That being said that’s a lot of work for something they should have handled securely in the first place and doesn’t give me much confidence about their security in general.

          • Empyreus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s an interesting read since the cause of the issue was something to do with a database change that caused an overlap of groups.