I’m so confused. My sister was telling me about how Taylor swift is re recording her old music because scooter Braun owns her old music and she wants to have sole ownership over it.

So how can she release similar or exact copies of songs she doesn’t own but other artist constantly have legal battles for having songs that have some similarities to it? Like Ice Ice Baby for example. Is she not violating copy right laws by doing this?

Edit: good news. I get it now!

  • CarlsIII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious as to what the fan response is. Artists recording newer versions of their songs is not often received well, if for no reason other than that fans tend to still prefer the originals.

    • gk99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the article @moon_crush linked, she broke a popularity record previously held by The Beatles with them.

    • SomeoneElse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Her fans are overwhelmingly supportive of her rereleases. Her former manager or whatever he was, made $250m profit from buying and then selling the master rights against her knowledge/wishes. It was a completely legal but shitty move and Taylor made the dispute very public. It wasn’t just her fans who supported her re-recording and rereleasing her albums though, a huge number of artists, music industry people, journalists and even politicians supported her.

    • dumples@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone loves the new versions. The new 10 minute version of all too well is amazing. She plays it at her eras concert every night and everyone knows the lyrics by heart