• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    The answer, they found, is that working muscles effectively outcompete tumors for the glucose supply. Because muscle contraction increases glucose uptake, exercise shifts metabolism, causing tumors to receive less of the fuel they need to grow.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Stupid question before even reading the article: doesn’t exercise control blood sugar levels, which in turn reduces the surplus fuel supply of any cancer cell trying to grow?

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nice one, you actually almost guessed what the study shows. I read the abstract and in general for melonomas and breast cancer in mice doing voluntary wheel running muscle glucose consumption went up and tumor consumption down. Tumor growth rate also slowed for the mice that ran.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes but if you suggest people with cancer reduce their glucose consumption the world thinks your crazy

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I vaguely remember that it depends on the cancer type whether that works. The study showed it for melonomas and breast cancer so for those there’s a good reason to decrease blood sugar or even doing a keto diet. I’d love to see further research on putting mice with melonomas on a keto diet.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Seyfried’s metabolic framework for cancer would indicate all cancer can only metabolize glucose. Ongoing studies in human’s right now with Seyfried’s press-pulse protocol on glioblastomas (aggressive standard of care only has a 6 month lifespan, so we will see results fairly quickly).

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The answer, they found, is that working muscles effectively outcompete tumors for the glucose supply. Because muscle contraction increases glucose uptake, exercise shifts metabolism, causing tumors to receive less of the fuel they need to grow.

      Nailed it. Down to the use of the word “fuel”.

      • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Exercise has both long and short term effects on glucose, 1. upregulates insulin receptor production, 2. fires off receptors on muscles to haul the glucose out of the blood and into the muscles for immediate use, and for storage as glycogen (stacks of glucose). And there’s a lot more being looked at in this paper, and for that matter more going on in exercise effects on tumors than just glucose regulation, tho’ it is an important piece.

        Precancer exercise capacity and metabolism during tumor development coordinate the skeletal muscle–tumor metabolic competition https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2508707122

        Significance It is well established from both preclinical and clinical studies that exercise protects against tumor growth and progression. However, the biomarkers of this beneficial effect are not well delineated. Here, we demonstrate using stable isotope tracer methodology and unbiased metabolomics analyses that aerobic exercise induces glucose repartitioning in rodents with breast cancer and melanoma. We further demonstrate that fitness—which can be measured along a continuum, beyond the binary “exercise/no exercise” paradigm that may not translate well to humans in practice—is a key predictor of tumor metabolism. These data highlight the importance of a nuanced, systemic view of the metabolic effects of exercise in cancer. Abstract Higher exercise capacity and regular exercise training improve cancer prognosis at all stages of disease. However, the metabolic adaptations to aerobic exercise training that mediate tumor–host interactions are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that voluntary wheel running slows tumor growth and repartitions glucose uptake and oxidation to skeletal and cardiac muscle and away from breast and melanoma tumors in mice. Further, prehabilitation induces repartitioning of glucose metabolism in obese mice: Uptake and oxidation of glucose are enhanced in skeletal and cardiac muscle, and reduced in tumors. These increases in muscle glucose metabolism and reductions in tumor glucose metabolism, correlated with slower tumor progression. Using [U-13C6] glucose infusion, we show that exercise increases the fractional contribution of glucose to oxidative metabolism in muscle while reducing it in tumors, suggesting that aerobic exercise shifts systemic glucose metabolism away from the tumor microenvironment and toward metabolically active tissues. Transcriptional analysis revealed downregulation of mTOR signaling in tumors from exercised mice. Collectively, our findings suggest that voluntary exercise may suppress tumor progression by enhancing host tissue glucose oxidation and limiting tumor glucose availability, supporting a model in which exercise-induced metabolic competition constrains tumor energetics.

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      going to the gym is always a positive because you snowball into other healthy lifestyle changes like eating better and drinking more water, for example

      • rollin@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        mm yeah that happens… either that or you just get very good at standing about leaning on exercise equipment while staring vacantly into space

      • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I wish I had better access to one. I have a membership to LifeTime Fitness through my work and it’s a FANCY gym, but it’s 20 minutes from my house. With 2 small children, a quick hour workout becomes about 2 hours. I work out with my spin bike in the basement. I’ve also got a bench and adjustable dumbbells, but I miss the community of the gym.