• jrubal1462@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m not quite familiar enough with Dilbert to be able to tell which “defining detail” was fucked up. Any hints?

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s the mouth. He doesn’t have one. Ever. This is extraordinarily consistent. I have rarely seen a strip where Dilbert visibly emotes (let alone happily), and never one where he has a mouth for that. I almost can’t even find something stupid enough to compare this to. It’s like Mario with a shaved mustache, except even worse because of how integral Dilbert’s lack of a mouth is to his characterization as somebody who’s never listened to.

      Edit: Just to clarify, I’m excluding the 1999–2000 TV sitcom. You can’t make your main character mouthless without severe drawbacks when you have to animate and voice him; it’s practically a necessary compromise. Even then, from what little I remember of the show, he was never beaming like this.

    • brian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 days ago

      after a quick glance at some other dilbert images, I think it’s the mouth? it seems like the “real” one doesn’t have a mouth