Over the decades the number of Linux distributions has effectively exploded, from a handful in the late ’90s to quite literally hundreds today, not counting minor variations. There lately see…
INTERMEDIARY BUILD LAYERS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES
DAYS OF REBASING yet NO REAL WORLD USE FOUND for building on anything above fedora:atomic
Wanted to base your image on someone elses anyway to save some work? We had a tool for that, it was called “FORKING”
“Distroless is built on GNOME OS” “error: /Tree contains both /etc and /usr/etc” - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged.
LOOK at what Devs have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the servers and window managers we built for them (These are REAL distros, done by REAL devs)
“Distroless”
looks inside
Distro
Remember Serverless? Servers all the way down.
INTERMEDIARY BUILD LAYERS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES
DAYS OF REBASING yet NO REAL WORLD USE FOUND for building on anything above
fedora:atomicWanted to base your image on someone elses anyway to save some work? We had a tool for that, it was called “FORKING”
“Distroless is built on GNOME OS” “
error: /Tree contains both /etc and /usr/etc” - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged.LOOK at what Devs have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the servers and window managers we built for them (These are REAL distros, done by REAL devs)
https://github.com/ublue-os/bazzite-firmware-nonfree/commits/bf835aec77e3af803acceffb789f8fb076fd779c/
https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/commit/70af39999c681566bd1c66f23834daa37b996aaa
https://github.com/ublue-os/main/pull/771
“Hello I would like 1.8 pixels please”
They have played us for absolute fools.
deleted by creator
Wouldn’t “distroless” just mean LFS?
I mean, if they’re packaging an OS for distribution, what makes that distroless?