And banning it was still a downgrade in freedom of speech for reddit
And the authorities allowing its supporters to be targeted for removal from political discussion is, in my opinion, a downgrade in constitutional protection of free speech
My understanding of jailbait (what an intro to a sentence) is that it’s about adults who look young, not children at all. Maybe my terminology’s behind the times though.
Are you saying it would be different if it was underage girls posting themselves in their underpants?
I think it would, but I’m surprised you’d seem to imply the same in your wording, is why I ask. Most people on the internet don’t admit they agree with me on stuff like this
I agree with this except I don’t think the victimization is inherent/universal & I’m not sure if the context it depends on is the same for both of us. Still kinda wonder tbh
And banning it was still a downgrade in freedom of speech for reddit
And the authorities allowing its supporters to be targeted for removal from political discussion is, in my opinion, a downgrade in constitutional protection of free speech
Holy shit, somebody scan this dudes pc asap. I have never wanted tp throw someone into an oubliette this bad. Fukcing creep.
CSAM is not speech, it’s a crime with actual victims.
I thought we were talking about “jailbait” i.e. not CSAM
Sexualized pictures of clothed children exist in a grey area that may or may not be CSAM depending on jurisdiction.
My understanding of jailbait (what an intro to a sentence) is that it’s about adults who look young, not children at all. Maybe my terminology’s behind the times though.
That’s not what the sub was, it was adults posting images of underage girls in their underpants.
Are you saying it would be different if it was underage girls posting themselves in their underpants?
I think it would, but I’m surprised you’d seem to imply the same in your wording, is why I ask. Most people on the internet don’t admit they agree with me on stuff like this
It would depend on the wider context of the community if it was a problem or not.
A community of grown men posting young girls for the express purpose of sexual gratification is the wider context for /r/jailbait, however.
Which is in my opinion not meaningful speech in any way and in fact actively victimizes the girls whose pictures are being creeped on.
I agree with this except I don’t think the victimization is inherent/universal & I’m not sure if the context it depends on is the same for both of us. Still kinda wonder tbh
deleted by creator
Yeah someone else checked me. Cheers though.
Nah that subreddit was for younger ones but not fully nude
Oh, guess I was wrong then. Weird, wonder where I got that impression from
And?
I don’t think I have to explain how victimizing children is generally a bad thing.
Didn’t ask, do you have anything relevant you’re getting at here?
You are the one defending CSAM in the name of free speech.
Nope, and I’ll take your answer as a “nope” too
I didn’t know that it was possible to have negative knowledge about what freedom of speech is, but there your brainwashed ass is talking.
If you think knowledge is negative, you’re simply anti-intellectual
Your reading comprehension checks out. I’ll block you before I get more of your valuable thoughts