• blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m asking you to recognize that we’ve set up a system

    I explicitly addressed this in my original post when I said:

    This doesn’t diminish the need to create policy-level solutions to address wages or housing affordability.

    absolutely is destined to fail

    My point is that “failure” is not a singular state. I have repeated this several times. If you are “destined to fail” then following good rules of personal finance is even more important to you than to someone who has some extra cash but is sad that they won’t be a homeowner. Every good financial descision that someone living with the budget you described makes is a decision that is keeping them housed and fed for longer. This is simple math.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you’re still not getting my point.

      Some people are positioned to fail and no amount of good behavior or savings will stop that.

      Do you agree with that statement?

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I neither agree nor disagree with that statement, because I disagree with the underlying premise - that there is such a thing as a singular state of financial failure - which is my whole point.

        What is your definition of “failure”? What happens to a person after they “fail”?