ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agoYahoo Answers rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1301arrow-down17
arrow-up1294arrow-down1imageYahoo Answers rulelemmy.dbzer0.comɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squareGalapagon@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·4 days agoYou can count to 31 on one hand and 1023 on two hands if you get really good at counting and adding with binary
minus-squareTheRealKuni@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-24 days agoThat is true! But I’m bad at recognizing the numbers (except four 🖕) once I’ve counted them. The 1-99 method (fingers on one hand are ones and thumb is 5, fingers on the other hand are tens and thumb is 50) is much easier to interpret.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoOne of the many reasons I made the switch.
You can count to 31 on one hand and 1023 on two hands if you get really good at counting and adding with binary
That is true! But I’m bad at recognizing the numbers (except four 🖕) once I’ve counted them. The 1-99 method (fingers on one hand are ones and thumb is 5, fingers on the other hand are tens and thumb is 50) is much easier to interpret.
One of the many reasons I made the switch.