• bigschnitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think they might encourage these people to buy luxury SUVS instead.

    Yes, they absolutely encourage motorists to get inherently less safe vehicles. They also impede emergency vehicle access, are a hazard to road users and increase wear on vehicles. Taking action against people with sports cars is an insane starting point in a reality where SUVs and trucks exist.

    Speed humps are objectively a bad solution, you can achieve the same desired outcome (slow traffic down) by reducing lane width. Adding bike lanes or planter boxes are both cheaper solutions without the same downsides.

    • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      im pretty sure speedbumps with non newtonian fluids exist that do nothing if you’re following the speed limit but do the speedbump thing if you’re not, idk why those aren’t widely adopted.

      • bigschnitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Fluid fill speed humps cost more and wear faster due to fatigue of moving components. Road maintenance is already a ponzi scheme, I can appreciate why local government doesn’t want to exacerbate that.

        The best solution is the most simple one: Narrow the lanes and plant canopied trees (for psychological reasons beyond my understanding, having a ceiling or obstruction above drivers slows them down as well).