• MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Try Marxist-Leninists. I literally had this exact conversation the other day with two .ml users… They were trying to claim communism “actually totally works” because Russia/China/etcetc have proven it … except they’re not communist countries. They then went on to explain that, “no aktually having a ruling party that continues to segregate the population and elevate and protect their own positions is totally communism! You need to read more theory, because there has to be a transition to communism …”

      blah blah blah… They’re literally too stupid to understand OP’s joke. They unironically think that stuff.

      • arcticx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        The withering of the state as a concept is a foundational part of ML theory and it does seem as though you’re being intentionally obtuse. I don’t think you would run into a ton of people who believe that OPs meme is an implausible situation as this is the exact reason continuous revolution exists as a concept. The transitional state has to be scrutinized so as not to become a tool of bourgeois capitalism once more.

        So yeah to echo what the others said to you: you should read more theory. Your understanding of these concepts seems to be more memetic than anything.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          lol No, my understanding is not lacking. I know what ML prescribes and imagines. I disagree it’s such a hopeful premise IRL.

          It’s also stupid to call any transitionary period ‘communism’ itself, either, much like supposedly China today.