TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 days agohe/him rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down19
arrow-up1407arrow-down1imagehe/him rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareMacchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49·6 days agoProudly fucking males? Boykisser confirmed? Or do I suck at reading again?
minus-squareRichardDegenne@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·6 days agoWith “male” being singular, I assume the intent was something like an infix expletive, but the double entendre is too good to pass up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expletive_infixation
minus-squareMacchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoNo worries I was willfully misinterpreting it, not actually having trouble understanding it. Appreciate the effort anyway though.
minus-squareHellfire103@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoJudging by the handkerchief, yes.
Proudly fucking males? Boykisser confirmed? Or do I suck at reading again?
With “male” being singular, I assume the intent was something like an infix expletive, but the double entendre is too good to pass up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expletive_infixation
No worries I was willfully misinterpreting it, not actually having trouble understanding it. Appreciate the effort anyway though.
Judging by the handkerchief, yes.