Nine months after the Pharmacare Act (C-64) received Royal Assent on October 10, 2024 , just four provinces and territories have signed bilateral agreements with the federal government. Those agreements are valued at $928 million over four years starting in 2026.
The Pharmacare Act is meant to provide universal access to Diabetes medication and contraceptives, making those pharmaceuticals free at the point of access for people covered by public health insurance. In order to implement that vision, the federal government needs to sign funding agreements with the provinces, who are responsible for administering health plans.
Manitoba, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island and Yukon are participating in the federal program, covering nearly 7.5 million people. The remaining nine provinces and territories without agreements are passing up valuable federal health care funding—which could be providing free medication to residents paid for by the federal government.
With so few jurisdictions enrolled in pharmacare, four out of five Canadians are not benefiting from the program. The gap is leaving a patchwork of coverage across the country.
A person in Manitoba benefits from free contraception, saving them hundreds of dollars each year, while someone in Alberta has to shoulder this cost on their own. A resident of British Columbia has their diabetes medication covered publicly, but loses that benefit if they have to move to Ontario.
The Pharmacare Act stipulates that the program must be “guided by the Canada Health Act.” The Canada Health Act includes universality and portability as two of its five central principles, which cannot be fulfilled until all provinces join the landmark pharmacare program.
Manitoba was also refusing it back when we had a Conservative government.
After we elected an NDP government, we gladly joined the program.
And we are benefitting from it.
Hopefully our neighbours can learn something from our experience.
What’s the argument against the funding? I’m not familiar with the politics of this. Sounds like a big positive for anyone.
What’s the argument against the funding?
Usually it’s some variant on “but muh taxes is too high…” typical conservative pandering stuff.
They don’t think poor people deserve medicine.
I’d say this should be entirely nationalized but as soon as we get a douchebag con leader like PP or Ford in power it would be dismantled, gutted, and privatized to shareholders for maximum profits.
at least right now, the few provinces that can take advantage of this are getting the rewards.
I swear, conservative governments are one brain cell away from getting their own 1980s march of dimes style parade.
Socialism for all.
should be entirely nationalized but as soon as we get a douchebag con leader like PP or Ford in power it would be dismantled
As I understand, this is the exact and specific reason for keeping it provincial – each province can damn themselves without impacting their neighbours.
Only 17.90% of Canada has access to pharmacare. It’s time roll the corrupt provincial politicians over the coals for allowing systematic murder to their constituents despite receiving taxpayer funds to expand healthcare.
The list of shame:
Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Newfoundland & Labrador, Nova Scotia, Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
Quebec already has a pharmacare program. Residents are required to either have a private plan, or participate in the provincial one (between $0 and $766/year, depending upon income). It covers a lot more than diabetes and contraceptive medication, too.
Having the whole country buy prescriptions instead of just the province gets better rates.
They’re either being barred by insurance firms protecting their revenues, or trying to figure out which oligarch to give the job of “administering” the program to. Or both. Perhaps it’s an internal, oligarch class, fight.
We need to organize to add more folks to the 14% of those covered under dental care and the 17.90% on pharmacare.
Our government serves the people not corpo lobbyists.
That’s crazy low number of people! I would have thought it was like more than 40%.



