Ohh I think I see what you are missing. “To the right of Ruby” doesn’t mean “the one card to the right”. It means every card to the right in the same row. So it’s not just talking about Stella, but also Uma and Tina. Uma and Tina are both Pam’s neighbours.
Haha no problem. I thought there might have been a misunderstanding of the rules somewhere, which is why I was trying to get you to explain your thought process.
I hope you can start having fun with these, I like them a lot. Some of the logic is really tricky, but there’s always a way to figure out the next innocent/criminal.
Why do you think it’s saying that Stella is Pam’s neighbour?
I am trying to not be rude
Can you explain it with words?
No one to the right of Ruby is Pam’s neighbor. Am I tripping? Like how is everyone else getting this but me‽
This is a legit question. I feel like I’m experiencing a stroke in slow motion.
Ohh I think I see what you are missing. “To the right of Ruby” doesn’t mean “the one card to the right”. It means every card to the right in the same row. So it’s not just talking about Stella, but also Uma and Tina. Uma and Tina are both Pam’s neighbours.
Thanks for handholding me through that.
Haha no problem. I thought there might have been a misunderstanding of the rules somewhere, which is why I was trying to get you to explain your thought process.
And you rock for that.
I hope you can start having fun with these, I like them a lot. Some of the logic is really tricky, but there’s always a way to figure out the next innocent/criminal.
The first clue says explicitly that the next person is Pam’s neighbor.
My first screenshot shows that the next person is very much not.
It doesn’t say that the next person is Pam’s neighbour at all, actually. Just that Pam only has one innocent neighbour, to the right of Ruby.