• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Edit: I’m wrong, see reply


      How do you think they create (analog) sound from the (digital) data from the USB-C port? There is an integrated chip with hardware USB support, stereo DAC and headphone-level amp, all of which is cheap now.

      Or was what you meant “the chip is built into the plug, the cable of the headphones is analog so subject to interference”? That is true and negates one of the advantages, although most audible interference is picked up pre-amplification (so the DAC and amp better be shielded, like inside a phone, which is not possible with USB-C).

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Thanks for the info. Still acceptable to skip the 3.5mm plug though. Just one less component easily replaced by usb-c.

      And I assume there are more expensive over ear headphones with a better DAC. Not that I’d ever be able to hear much of a difference lol