• misterred@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    The OP’s and article’s subjects did not specify a need for the less secure Android OS. And the NitroPhone is entirely deGoogled which @[email protected] or others could understand by reading the linked article, rather than rushing into snark-combat.

    Tuta’s article was not about nonPixel phones. It was about escaping the Google ecosystem which aligns with the Nitro’s purpose, along with its hardening of security by physical removal of pixel’s sensors, to start. The [re-]design philosophy and methodology appear sound. If I were looking for a new, deGoogled phone now in the $900+ USD range, it would likely be my top consideration.

    But again, it was an interesting article.

    • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      While I have rewritten my first comment, I’ll add an answer: NitroPhone has the same usecases as Graphene, and deGoogling is a side goal to privacy, in opposition to e.g. Lineage. This article seems to be for pure deGoogling and, to a lesser extent, phones assembled in Europe, which Nitro is not. A final reason is that Nitrokey is unknown to many, and possibly those that made Tuta’s post.

      • misterred@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        “All Nitrokeys [presumably including their reengineered phones; I’m not 100% certain, but that appears the case] are produced in Germany”