• Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you’re interested in the history of the hobby, it’s important, and there are good bits in there, but… yeah. It’s extremely messy, sometimes outright broken, and sexist even by the standards of its time and context.

    I love 3e, but it was the first edition I played. If you look at it and think, “No, absolutely not,” I can’t argue with you. :P It’s a mess, but it’s in my trash pile.

    • ReCursing@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Oh yeah, I hear ya. 2e was my first DND (though not my first RPG, that was Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay 1e), and I never want to play it again but Planescape still holds a special place in my heart! Fortunately, though, now we can have our nostalgia while playing mechanically better games instead!

      • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh yeah, the thing I appreciate most about 2e were the campaign settings. 3e was also pretty great in that regard, but without quite the variety.

        To take the rose-tinted glasses off for a bit… yeah, I would rather play mechanically better games. I might dip into 2e or 3e for a short adventure, but if I want to do a campaign, I’d look elsewhere. There are systems that do old-school D&D better, modern D&D better, and other things entirely. Speaking of Planescape, I was thinking of running something like Blades in the Dark, set in Sigil.

        • ReCursing@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I can see BitD working well. I considered a 13th Age game, replacing then icons with then Factions, but never did it. We tend to play in homebrew settings anyway, nowadays