In a surprisingly flattering profile in The New York Times, Marjorie Taylor Greene portrays herself as a political naif who actually believed Donald Trump’s campaign promises and suffered death threats once she broke with the president.

The article softens Greene’s image by omitting some of her most outrageous behavior. The story mentions that she “harassed 18-year-of gun activist David Hogg on the street,” without mentioning that Hogg was himself the survivor of a mass shooting at his high school. There’s no word about Greene calling Hogg “little Hitler” or about the time Greene kicked another teen activist. Nor is there any mention of Greene’s suggestion that Paul Pelosi, husband of then-speaker Nancy Pelosi, knew the man who assaulted him in his home, a homophobic lie circulated by the right.

None of Greene’s actions are presented as beyond the pale. Instead reporter Robert Draper characterizes her in far gentler terms than Greene’s behavior would admit: “Greene did harbor a genuine conspiratorial streak, often even wondering if this or that person wore a wire. But she was also becoming an increasingly shrewd and acerbic observer of life on Capitol Hill.”

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I believe she actually believed Trump’s bullshit. But that doesn’t make her “savvy;” that makes her a fucking moron.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah (I can’t believe I’m saying this) but in Marjorie’s defense she described herself as “naive”, and that is also the quote the New York Times put in the banner.

      It sounds like she is having a literal come to Jesus moment but I also think the readers of the Times are high enough IQ to know that that doesn’t erase the past actions.

      • James R Kirk@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I am loathe to defend her, but she’s actually remained pretty ideologically consistent (terrible but consistent) in her brief political career. She came into office with Qanon beliefs and wanting the Epstein Files to be released and anti vax nonsense and now she no longer is in the Qult but she’s still talking about the same things.