• pulsey@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Too expensive and thus a too heavy burden on society while much cheaper alternatives exist.

    • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      “expensive”

      How? In what terms?

      Because during my studies in conservation, the only barrier of “expensive” is monetary cost which is entirely societal systems of arbitrary monetary value which has nothing to do with the actual material or labor costs.

      Is it actually a burden on society or simply a burden on the interests of private industry?