• lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nooooo anything but more environmentally friendly vehicles that people can actually afford. Won’t somebody think of the profits?

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      not sure about environmentally friendly,friendlier sure, but a well developed public transit system and biking infrastructure beats any kind of car based infrastructure

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Complements. The reason we’re stuck in this auto-dystopia (are we auto-asphyxiating? ;-) is people wanting one size fits all infrastructure. Let’s apply this more intelligently this time - recognize that some areas are more built up than others and different solutions scale differently . In general that can be a good thing, but we need interconnected services for everyone. That does include cars in many areas, although I agree a worthwhile goal for cities/town centers is that people not need a car

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Won’t somebody think of the profits?

      This article is literally about people doing this