• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Sure but if they break, it’s a more expensive repair, one that I may be able to do myself whereas replacing a mirror or mirror housing isn’t that hard.

    I want less computerization of cars, personally. Or at least a repairable, customizable, and FOSS system, if I have to have computers in my car.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “If they break”, oh yes, let’s fund a strawman.

      Go see what a broken mirror costs today.

      Glass alone, if heated (many are) $100+. Actual motorized mirror: $300+. Then there’s painting to match.

      Cameras would be smaller, less likely to get damaged, and are pretty commodity tech these days.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        It ain’t the glass that costs. It’s the sleek custom designed shape of the housing that costs all that money. Not the mirror.

        A plain round simple mirror that is externally mounted is cheap and easy to replace. But it won’t make your car look as fast or as cool.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “If they break”, oh yes, let’s fund a strawman.

        …you don’t think car parts break? Or are you the type to just get a new one every few years so you’ve never experienced it?

        Glass alone, if heated (many are) $100+. Actual motorized mirror: $300+. Then there’s painting to match.

        Who exactly is the one building a strawman, here? 🤔 sources, please

        Cameras would be smaller, less likely to get damaged, and are pretty commodity tech these days.

        Fair, debatable, and fair. Definitely not cheaper than a mirror, though. Maybe on a luxury car, absolutely not on anything more common.