• Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Short version: There’s no way to define “woman” using so-called “objective facts” such that you include all cisgender women while excluding all transgender women.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is actually a general problem with strict definitions. See also the sandwich question. Definitions are in reality built more on consensus than rigor.