• BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ehhhh, we had a perception as the big damn heroes after tipping the scales in WW2 and then with the founding of the UN, being the only member state that wasn’t devastated by WW2, positioning us as the de facto enforcer. There was some very limited good work done in that context that got good press in Europe. But we were also overthrowing democratic south American nations nonstop during that time… And everything since…

    There have been times that others thought we were the good guys, but they were probably just wrong.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah… All those deaths at the loss of USAID are evidence that the programs weren’t doing anything in the first place.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Wouldn’t it be evidence of literally the opposite? USAID shuts down, people die because of it. Therefore, USAID programs were working.

        • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was reading that one as sarcastic, despite lack of /s And USAID is a decent counterpoint. The US HAS done good things! We’ve also done a HUGE amount of horrible ones and atrocities. Also we’ve got a habit of ALMOST eradicating some of the worst diseases of all time from the face of the planet and then going “ehhhh, it’s the third world’s problem now” so they can come back some years later despite having done 95% of the work.

          In the same way that billionaires can do good things, the US can do good things and still be bad. We are absolutely capable of being good. This is a choice.