This is a much cheaper and faster way to get nuclear power.

    • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just FYI reactor grade uranium is generally enriched below 5% whereas weapons grade is enriched to ~85%

      • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Aircraft carriers don’t use reactor grade, they use HEU for more power out of smaller more compact reactors and less frequent refueling. IIRC 93%+ is common.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes. The new scam of smr is selling something inferior that hasn’t failed yet, but needs massive enrichment infrastrucure for very high comparative fuel costs… Mostly imported from russia until we build more failures to enrich it.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Weapons grade uranium is so expensive and energy intensive to make that I can’t imagine they would ever pay for it and the fuel is at end of life so would need refueling soon.

      The navy likely puts a safety margin on the fuel so there is probably some life left in the fuel but I would be very surprised if it lasted more than a year or two which is where I am confused on how this would work