NanoooK@sh.itjust.works to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agoAfter GOTY pull, Clair Obscur devs draw line in sand over AI: 'Everything will be made by humans by us'www.polygon.comexternal-linkmessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down17 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1208arrow-down1external-linkAfter GOTY pull, Clair Obscur devs draw line in sand over AI: 'Everything will be made by humans by us'www.polygon.comNanoooK@sh.itjust.works to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square78fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareNate Cox@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days agoMy entire post was a rebuttal of the “functionally no different than humans doing the same thing”. Humans take inspiration and use it to express themselves uniquely, genAI just steals and replicates. They are in no way “doing the exact same thing”.
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down8·2 days agoSo your entire argument is semantics. Gen AI does more than just replicating existing works. You’re not going to get the same result with the same prompt; each result will be unique. And I’d argue that the person writing the prompt is the one providing the inspiration to get the software to express what’s in their head.
My entire post was a rebuttal of the “functionally no different than humans doing the same thing”.
Humans take inspiration and use it to express themselves uniquely, genAI just steals and replicates. They are in no way “doing the exact same thing”.
So your entire argument is semantics.
Gen AI does more than just replicating existing works. You’re not going to get the same result with the same prompt; each result will be unique.
And I’d argue that the person writing the prompt is the one providing the inspiration to get the software to express what’s in their head.