Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Sunday defended the Justice Department’s decision to release just a fraction of the Jeffrey Epstein files by the congressionally mandated deadline as necessary to protect survivors of sexual abuse by the disgraced financier.

Blanche pledged that the Trump administration eventually would meet its obligation required by law. But he stressed that the department was obligated to act with caution as it goes about making public thousands of documents that can include sensitive information.

Friday’s partial release of the Epstein files has led to a new crush of criticism from Democrats who have accused the Republican administration of trying to hide information.

Blanche called that pushback disingenuous as President Donald Trump’s administration continues to struggle with calls for greater transparency, including from members of his political base, about the government’s investigations into Epstein, who once counted Trump as well as several political leaders and business titans among his peers.

“The reason why we are still reviewing documents and still continuing our process is simply that to protect victims,” Blanche told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “So the same individuals that are out there complaining about the lack of documents that were produced on Friday are the same individuals who apparently don’t want us to protect victims.”

Blanche’s comments were the most extensive by the administration since the file dump, which included photographs, interview transcripts, call logs, court records and other documents. But some of the most consequential records expected about Epstein were nowhere to be found, such as FBI interviews with survivors and internal Justice Department memos examining charging decisions. Those records could help explain how investigators viewed the case and why Epstein was allowed in 2008 to plead guilty to a relatively minor state-level prostitution charge.

Trump, who was friends with Epstein for years before the two had a falling-out, tried for months to keep the records sealed. Though Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, he has argued there is nothing to see in the files and that the public should focus on other issues.

Federal prosecutors in New York brought sex trafficking charges against Epstein in 2019, but he killed himself in jail after his arrest. Democrat see a cover-up, not an effort to protect victims

But Democratic lawmakers on Sunday hammered Trump and the Justice Department for a partial release.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., argued that the Justice Department is obstructing the implementation of the law mandating the release of the documents not because it wants to protect the Epstein victims.

“It’s all about covering up things that, for whatever reason, Donald Trump doesn’t want to go public, either about himself, other members of his family, friends, Jeffrey Epstein, or just the social, business, cultural network that he was involved in for at least a decade, if not longer,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

Blanche also defended the department’s decision to remove several files related to the case from its public webpage, including a photograph showing Trump, less than a day after they were posted.

The missing files, which were available Friday but no longer accessible by Saturday, included images of paintings depicting nude women, and one showed a series of photographs along a credenza and in drawers. In that image, inside a drawer among other photos, was a photograph of Trump, alongside Epstein, Melania Trump and Epstein’s longtime associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

More in the article.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Blanche pledged that the Trump administration eventually would meet its obligation required by law.

    Its obligation required by law was that it should all be released by Friday. You know what happens to regular people when they break the law and reply with “I’ll eventually obey it”?

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    They withheld some, they *redacted some, they edited some. It could not possibly be more against the law if they tried. (They did try.)

  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    it’s way past “rule of law”. there is no law.

    they control the supreme court. therefore they are the law. law won’t save us

  • human@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “So the same individuals that are out there complaining about the lack of documents that were produced on Friday are the same individuals who apparently don’t want us to protect victims."

    My kid uses they same argument all the time.

    “No, you can’t eat that. It’s junk.”

    “Oh, so you want me to starve???”

  • Bone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Easy. They consider Donald Trump, and other pedophiles, to be the victims. That’s who they are protecting.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Is it just me or does this headline sound extremely biased? The Democrats are doing the right thing here, but they’re portrayed like a kid throwing a tantrum, while the bullshit-spouting MAGAt is portrayed like the level-headed administrator?

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The “news”, nearly worldwide is owned by the class that installed these “leaders”. Of course they will do everything possible to shift the tides in their direction.

  • BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Nowhere in the article does it mention that Todd Blanche used to be Trump’s personal defense lawyer.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Nobody believes that bullshit. They had thirty days, and only now they spring the news. With no timeline for future releases. With no explanation of the redactions.

    Anyone who has run any program of any size or shape, ever, knows how to explain dates and actions better than this.

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Man I don’t know about y’all but I would not be allowing this Administration to move me to the front of the scapegoat list like this. What a dumb move on his part to be taking Center Stage here.