• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    Especially after the protagonist has gunned down like a hundred security guards to get into that office.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This always got me in Avatar: the Last AIrbender. Half the last season is Aang fretting about how he’ll have to kill the firelord. By this point Aang had already single-handedly sunk an entire naval fleet.

    • Bad_Engineering@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was thinking more in the sense of the villain giving their little speech to a protagonist that hasn’t ever killed anyone that “If you kill me then your just like me, you’ll be equally bad even though I’ve killed thousands and my death would actually be of benefit to the world.”

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        there exists within media a CIA promoted ideal that the working people of a villainous organization don’t matter but the head of said organization is a rational and moral actor. when spider-man pummels 100 guards to get to kingpin and then has a conversation about ethics with kingpin and ultimately captures kingpin instead of breaking his spine the way he did those random goons it creates within the mind a pro-hierarchy understanding of the world that those goons were there to be pummeled but that kingpin has access to agency they don’t. a truly moral hero would enter the building, create a false dilemma for the guards to solve with their best solution being to leave the building for their own safety, and then beat up the guy with the most agency

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Hell, this goes so much further back. I could draw a parallel to the Book of Exodus.

          Moses is commanded by God to go to Pharaoh and free the Israelites. He does this by terrorizing the Egyptian populace, a populace that are under the total control of an absolute totalitarian ruler. They literally worship their king as a god. Imagine if Exodus had consisted of Moses telling Pharaoh:

          “God says let my people go. If you don’t, tomorrow you’ll trip and break your left leg. If you don’t let them go, the next day you’ll break your right leg. The day after that you’ll break both your arms. The day after that you’ll die of a heart attack at high noon. These same conditions will apply to the next Pharaoh until my people are free.”

          There. Moses accomplishes his mission, and the only person who has to get hurt is the only person that has any agency in the process. But no, instead God insists on terrorizing the innocent Egyptian populace instead.

        • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, obviously things like wars with non democratic states where the populace is not in favor of a war¹ should be ended with minimal collateral damage by doing whatever it takes to kill the guys in charge of stuff and spare as many conscripts as possible

          But goon lives don’t matter. Zuckerberg’s personal security know what they’re doing. The NYPD know what they’re doing. I don’t see any moral issue with their deaths.

          ¹so Russia but not the Zionists

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sure, but you and I live by a different code of ethics than the characters who are shown mowing down goons without regard and then letting the head bad guy who manipulated all those goons live. That’s the part I’m saying is a problem. You either have to have a character enact a wholly non-violent solution to the problem, or you have to have the character murder their way up the org chart and confront the top bad guy with the same violence they confronted everyone else they encountered with. What we most often see in movies is a confirmation that those with power have power because they are supposed to, which is a fundamentally fascist world view

            • Dymonika@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              have a character enact a wholly non-violent solution to the problem

              They really tried that with Superman!

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        no, tlou2 is ambiguous in many ways but the ellie people are the bad guys.

        spoiler

        they would sacrifice that one girl for a cure for the entire humanity and she was even ok with it in hindsight, joel was the one to just go up and just kill everyone to get her back because he felt bad at the very last second, dooming humanity in the process. then just fucking off to live his comfy life on this small village. like nice one, dick.

        • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I was more talking about how you kill hundreds, if not thousands, of random dudes and then the game tries to make you feel bad for wanting to kill another one.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            oh yeah, that’s always a great way to break my immersion but its almost unavoidable 😔

            we are the baddies though so it tracks somewhat this time. the game even addresses this contradiction here and there.