I never said it was. that was never the point. if something is nsfw, it should be tagged as such for the courtesy of anyone who might not want to see that at the moment. that’s both in line with the instance rules, and the anarchist code of conduct, which this instance follows.
what exactly about common courtesy is offensive to you, can I ask you that?
is there nudity? yes? then it’s nsfw. that’s not something you get to argue about. and before you start, I’m not interested in listening to you moralizing about what sort of places this would be appropriate to view in. if what I have said wasn’t true, then the OP is @[email protected], who is an admin. if I was wrong, they would be in a position to tell me thus. instead, they tagged it nsfw which is the courteous thing to do.
now, you’ve started to annoy me, and I don’t think this is worth any more of my time. so I’m gonna move on and ignore you for now because I don’t see the point in arguing over it when the situation has already been resolved. if you don’t like how things turned out, then I encourage you to start a governance thread over it and perhaps get the rules changed or clarified to exempt artwork.
I got real slutty bare ankles right now. Hands too. Does that make me nude? Can see this fucking slut’s hair too! Her hair!
Love jumping straight to an appeal to authority instead of addressing anything about my point or your misogyny, which I wasn’t even calling that. A few more anarchists like you and we’ll be smelting pig iron in our backyards.
Why? Genuinely why?
just to be nice for the people who might be in public? why is common courtesy so strange to people on fedi?
But its not porn. This imean. That’s kind of the point.
And the association that a woman’s breast is automatically pornographic is pretty fucked up.
I never said it was. that was never the point. if something is nsfw, it should be tagged as such for the courtesy of anyone who might not want to see that at the moment. that’s both in line with the instance rules, and the anarchist code of conduct, which this instance follows.
what exactly about common courtesy is offensive to you, can I ask you that?
But that’s my argument. It’s not. Nothing about this is nsfw.
And your ‘common courtesy’ is talking a lot of shit about my body. It does not seem to be common to femme-coded bodies.
is there nudity? yes? then it’s nsfw. that’s not something you get to argue about. and before you start, I’m not interested in listening to you moralizing about what sort of places this would be appropriate to view in. if what I have said wasn’t true, then the OP is @[email protected], who is an admin. if I was wrong, they would be in a position to tell me thus. instead, they tagged it nsfw which is the courteous thing to do.
now, you’ve started to annoy me, and I don’t think this is worth any more of my time. so I’m gonna move on and ignore you for now because I don’t see the point in arguing over it when the situation has already been resolved. if you don’t like how things turned out, then I encourage you to start a governance thread over it and perhaps get the rules changed or clarified to exempt artwork.
have a nice fucking day.
I got real slutty bare ankles right now. Hands too. Does that make me nude? Can see this fucking slut’s hair too! Her hair!
Love jumping straight to an appeal to authority instead of addressing anything about my point or your misogyny, which I wasn’t even calling that. A few more anarchists like you and we’ll be smelting pig iron in our backyards.
disengage.