The GNOME.org Extensions hosting for GNOME Shell extensions will no longer accept new contributions with AI-generated code. A new rule has been added to their review guidelines to forbid AI-generated code.

Due to the growing number of GNOME Shell extensions looking to appear on extensions.gnome.org that were generated using AI, it’s now prohibited. The new rule in their guidelines note that AI-generated code will be explicitly rejected

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    34·
    21 days ago

    So what does this mean? Bc like (at least with my boss) whenever I submit ai generated code at work I still have to have a deep and comprehensive understanding of the changes that I made, and I have to be right (meaning I have to be right about what I say bc I cannot say the AI solved the problem). What’s the difference between that and me writing the code myself (+googling and stack overflow)?

    • theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish
      8·
      20 days ago

      The difference is people aren’t being responsible with AI

      You’re projecting competence onto others. You speak like you’re using AI responsibly

      I use AI when it makes things easier. All the time. I bet you do too. Many people are using AI without a steady hand, without the intellectual strength to use it properly in a controlled manner

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        0·
        20 days ago

        Its like a gas can over a match. Great for starting a campfire. Excellent for starting a wildfire.

        Learning the basics and developing a workflow with VC is the answer.

          • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
            21·
            20 days ago

            Large language models are incredibly useful for replicating patterns.

            They’re pretty hit and miss with writing code, but once I have a pattern that can’t easily be abstracted, I use it all the time and simply review the commit.

            Or a quick proof of concept to ensure a higher level idea can work. They’re great for that too.

            It is very annoying though when I have people submit me code that is all AI and incredibly incorrect.

            Its just another tool on my belt. Its not going anywhere so the real trick is figuring out when to use it and why and when not to use it.

            To be clear VC was version control. I should have been more clear.

            • theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish
              2·
              20 days ago

              Okay, that’s pretty fair. You seem to understand the tool properly

              I’d argue that version control is not the correct layer to evaluate output, but it is a tool that can be used in many different ways…I don’t think that’s a great workflow, but I can conceive situations where that’s viable enough

              If I were handing out authorizations to use AI, you’d get it

        • theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish
          1·
          20 days ago

          We do this all the time. I’m certified for a whole bunch of heavy machinery, if I were worse people would’ve died

          And even then, I’ve nearly killed someone. I haven’t, but on a couple occasions I’ve come way too close

          It’s good that I went through training. Sometimes, it’s better to restrict who is able to use powerful tools