I would much prefer that rich artists have the capacity to make art and try to make money off it than all mass media be controlled by a few organisations. It’s a shame it wasn’t a humongous success. We might benefit from more artists and more investors taking risks.
Why?
It’s Megalollipolisin’ time!
This is what I came for!
Precisely what I clicked through to comment. 🤌🏼
Didn’t he have to sell his vineyard (the absolute indignation of it!) because the movie lost so much? He probably wants some money back.
I would much prefer that rich artists have the capacity to make art and try to make money off it than all mass media be controlled by a few organisations. It’s a shame it wasn’t a humongous success. We might benefit from more artists and more investors taking risks.
Poor man must be so thirsty…
But why tho?
I’ll be even funnier the second time
Well if you put it like that, it’s morbin time!
Sony please, this time we’ll see it.
Desperately trying to make money?
Wouldn’t that be easier if they picked one of his watchable films instead?
But then the people who lost money on this film wouldn’t make their money back.
It’ll trickle down.
It was him; he financed it himself by taking out loans against properties he owned. He’s selling things off now to pay the loans back.