UniversalMonk, PapaSkwat, DonaldJMusk, TheSilentNickel, QuantumTickler, his communities are full of Astro turfing sock puppets.
EDIT: My list of sock puppets. I doubt it’s perfect and I may have picked up a few that weren’t him
Area15@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today
EndlessApollo@hilariouschaos.com
EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
KaratinBandit@feddit.uk
PapaSkwat@lemmings.world
PapaSkwat@lemmy.today
PhilipsHurtFeelings@crazypeople.online
QuantumTickle@maga.place
Rhoerii@lemy.lol
Snatchdaddy@hilariouschaos.com
TheSilentNickel@feddit.org
barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf
donaldjmusk@maga.place
thesilentnickel@lemmy.today
thesilentnickel@lemmyusa.com
donaldjmusk@lemmyusa.com
quantumtickler@hilariouschaos.com
quantumtickler@feddit.org
quantumtickler@lemmy.myserv.one
To the mods of this comm, I understand this isn’t a post complaining about a mod action taken against me. It’s hardly even a complaint against a mod, although he does mod a handful of communities. I know it’s a hard-to-prove personal message that the accused will deny sending or say was a joke he told a troll, his word vs mine. But this is beyond the usual actions mods take. This is abuse of the fediverse, harrassment, ban evasion, and vote manipulation.
I believe the situation to be self evident even without this message that the users who frequent DonaldJMusk’s comms are primarily him with a new username on a new server and they’re leaking out into other communities with ill intent.
If action is to be taken against this post, I ask that it be locked and not deleted.
Except an admin confirmed UM isn’t doing this.
Did they actually confirm it wasn’t UM, or did they say there wasn’t enough evidence to confirm it was UM?
No proof it was UM doing this via any IP addresses. The admin from lemmy.today posted here in reply to someone.
Absence of proof is not proof of absense.
No proof doesn’t mean proof he isn’t. And what they call no proof is bullshit. There’s plenty of proof.
Not finding Bigfoot is proof Bigfoot is real.
Tf? Dude…. lol! The reach you’ll shoot for to think you have a point is astounding!
Still waiting for proof.
As am I.
No, they didn’t.
Yes, they did.
Okay, show where they proved it.
https://lemmy.today/comment/20873694 https://lemmy.today/comment/20873891
But I’m sure you’ll not believe this like everything else that you disagree with like a Republican.
Again, not finding evidence he is- isn’t proof he isn’t. They NEVER once said he’s not- they said they didn’t find proof.
And they didn’t find any because they didn’t even fucking bother to look- because they’re someone that HAD proof and they never talked to him. So go ahead and fuck all the way off with this bullshit.
And….
LMFAO! I’m a republican because I think you’re full of shit? My god, how are you not embarrassed by your own smug bullshit?
And your evidence is?
Which one is smug? It’s not me, it’s the one who’s lmfao anytime they are asked for proof.
What evidence do I need? I’m not the one bullshitting here.
You made a claim, you got called out. No need to pile on even more shame than simply being you has brought.
Walk away, son.
I’m staying where I am, you’re the one who’s just mad he can’t give evidence to claims.
OP didn’t give any. You didn’t give any. The admin who claims they have it didn’t give any because “security”.
Is there anything that would make you believe you could be wrong? I’m waiting for evidence. I’ll gladly be wrong and block UM for fooling me.
Still finding it funny last time you got mad at you reported me and you got deleted for it.
And this admin, do they administer all of these instances? Or just one of them?
lemmy.today admin, so the one who a chunk of the bots are under.
Better, but he could just be using a device with a VPN. I have enough old ass computers in my house to do the same thing.
Could be. But also somehow UM is smart enough to avoid everything but also dumb enough to be caught.
Or rather, this admin, do they have a WAF? Are they analyzing the traffic that comes in? Are the sure they’re checking every point of interaction for consistency? If no, then they didn’t really “Check”.
This admin will state that UM is a bot. And wouldn’t ya know it some of the other signup attempts used the alt names. Weird that.
I don’t think many admins know infosec practices very well to be frank.
So we have 2 admins who have proof he’s not and 1 who has no proof (documents, photos, just anecdotal).
Nooope, I have IP data, email logs, and other things. However, much of the data had fallen off my WAF retention period. Oddly convenient how you just assume I don’t have these things rather than keeping them close because I don’t want the bots to figure out how I’m catching them.
When you conveniently leave out that providing proof reduces an admins ability to re-use certain detection methods, it makes me pretty convinced you’re complicit.
How the heck would anyone but you know that your proof would reveal your detection method? That’s not a given.
And what’s the point of collecting proof if the only way you have to convince others is “trust me bro, I’ve got the evidence, but you can’t see it, my dog ate it.”
And then when asked for proof you jump to implicate the person asking for proof? That’s terrible form. We have an instance rule against bad-jacketing users:
Weird how he’s just not gonna give it away. I’m sure any day now they’ll have proof he’s a robot and also a Tankie and also a fascist and also a shill and also…
Well, You’re more than welcome to reach out on more secure comms, such as matrix to get the proof! It’s strange how that’s basically standard for most of the other respectable instances, but not here.
Give the documents then? And am I a bot now too?
Haven’t you heard? You and I are the same bot. And we control a top secret government-sanctioned group of bots who create bots who create more bots. Because Lemmy has millions and millions of users and can topple entire governments. Keep up, man! 🤣
God I wish I was paid to shit post, would make dealing with morons easier like my retail gig.
Interesting how you continue to leave out the security implications of posting this publicly.
Odd that.
I know not if you are a bot, you aren’t on my instance, nor would it be likely you could get through my process.
I do know that you are awfully defensive of sockpuppet like behavior though.
The sock puppet behavior of… One user being harassed by users and defending them? The sock puppet behavior of… Wanting screenshots?
Hey @[email protected] is it possible to take screenshots that would prove something without being a security leak?
Like somehow you claim he signed up with the same email. Or same address, or anything. But no proof because it’s a security risk.
You have ZERO admins with proof he’s not.
lemmy.today and lemmy.db0, but sure.
Show the proof then.
It’s in the thread but I guess you’re blind to anyone who proves you wrong.
https://lemmy.today/comment/20873694 https://lemmy.today/comment/20873891
So you deny that you’re entirely full of shit, and then bring proof that you are?
You do you, foo!
So how does that prove me wrong? Where’s the evidence form you?
Hey don’t forget the admin that says I’m a bot now. DM me and I’ll give ya my phone number so we can chat. I wanna know if my voice sounds like a bot too!
I appreciate the offer but it might be better for the admin who swears you’re a bot. Phone calls are always a moment of anxiety for me.