• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t. Those were some rough times, when you didn’t know whether or not you’d get the actual MP3, or a recording of a Bill Clinton impersonator selling something. These days it’s a lot easier to find direct downloads to the exact track you want, in a guaranteed 320Kbps MP3 or even a lossless format like FLAC.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        FLAC or WAV are lossless so yes.
        MP3 or Ogg Vorbis are lossy so better for listening on the go.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        It’s what I archive all my music in, so I’d say so. You get WAV quality without WAV file sizes.

        When a FLAC (or any lossless) file is not available, I settle for 320Kbps MP3 (and not a single bit less). The quality is decent enough to be used in a live setting (I’m a DJ). Anything less than 320kbps, and you’re hurting treble output, which will be noticeable on high-end speakers to anyone under the age of 30.

        • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Thank you for the detailed answer
          Now that i know i can stop archiving all the available file types (i mainly was too lazy to research…)

      • As a rule of thumb, yes. Then you have purists who only listen to ripped vinyl records in 24 bits, 192kHz WAV format or people who don’t give a fuck about quality and live happily with millions of 128kbps MP3s.