cm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 2 days agoHDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.www.heise.deexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1211arrow-down1external-linkHDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.www.heise.decm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareThe_Decryptor@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agohttps://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015OW3GJK There’s always this option, could even include something like it in the box.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 days agoThat’s a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.
minus-squareentwine@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThat probably won’t work. It will get basic video and maybe audio through, but not features like VRR, which is why you’d care about HDMI 2.1 support at all
https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015OW3GJK
There’s always this option, could even include something like it in the box.
That’s a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.
That probably won’t work. It will get basic video and maybe audio through, but not features like VRR, which is why you’d care about HDMI 2.1 support at all