EUPL - v1.2 [EN / English]
eupl.eu
European Union Public Licence [EUPL] v1.2 [EN / English]

TLDR: It’s compatible with other copy-left licenses like GPLv3. However, it’s available in multiple languages, which technically makes it more applicable.

I started using it for my own project. If you want a practical example: https://github.com/TimoKats/emmer

  • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    2·
    6 hours ago

    I hope you are right but fear that in practice (has this ever been tested?) you might not be.
    See for example this discussion ( note especially comments by ‘MadHatter’ )

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      1·
      1 hour ago

      A lot of the discussion seems to be US centric though, such as this quote:

      Courts have a strong tendency to read licences on their faces, that is to say, they look only to the text of the licence to determine rights and obligations. In some cases, courts have explicitly refused [link to https://creativecommons.org/2017/07/06/cc-amicus-brief/] amicus briefs from the authors of the licences who wished to clarify the intended interpretation of their text.

      Since this links to a US court decision, I believe the first part also refers to the US. As little as I know about EU law, what I do know is that it is often intentionally vague to ensure the spirit of the law cannot be violated. That seems to be the same for the EUPL where vagueness is preferred over concrete definitions which may hold up even worse in (EU) court due to the limitations on copyright law.