It says they’d been tricking investors for 8 years, we’ll before ChatGPT. I assume they overpromised in the early years, leveraging labor as a “stopgap” for the developing AI. Then things eventually caught up and they couldn’t deliver, leading to the current situation.
Eight years is a long time, so who was “duped” when can really change the narrative of the headline.
Wouldn’t the time it takes be a give away?
It says they’d been tricking investors for 8 years, we’ll before ChatGPT. I assume they overpromised in the early years, leveraging labor as a “stopgap” for the developing AI. Then things eventually caught up and they couldn’t deliver, leading to the current situation.
Eight years is a long time, so who was “duped” when can really change the narrative of the headline.