My comment doesn’t mean I think it was deactivated for money. It means that since Twitter says the commission abuse the ad system while the commission doesn’t use paid advertisements on the platform, twitters claim is bullshit since I’m not sure how you can abuse a system you don’t use ;)
… says whom?
Literally says so in the article. Maybe read it?
The question was whom the source was for the deactivation had anything to do with money. The article doesn’t claim that.
The original deactivation motivation was only due to using the ad composer in a way Xitter didn’t like:
https://www.politico.eu/article/x-axes-european-commissions-ad-account-after-e120m-eu-fine/i
My comment doesn’t mean I think it was deactivated for money. It means that since Twitter says the commission abuse the ad system while the commission doesn’t use paid advertisements on the platform, twitters claim is bullshit since I’m not sure how you can abuse a system you don’t use ;)
who*