• Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well, the 300 000 civilians who died because of the bombs weren’t involved, so I’m guessing they didn’t care.

    • Forester@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Of the roughly 270k fatalities most were from the blunt force trauma (shockwave) and heat wave created by igniting the bombs not radiation. The lethal doses received at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were only possible during initial exposure when the immediate area was saturated by high energy particles. Radiation levels rapidly dropped and had returned to normal in a month on the ground.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So all the decades of horrible consequences are ‘normal’?

        I’m not sure you know what you’re talking about.

        • Forester@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          ? I don’t think you grasp what is being discussed here.

          I’m not saying that if you were burned by nuclear fire it would disipate away I’m saying that if you avoided being irradiated for the first few weeks after detonation you had avoided all of the fallout risk.