A New York subway rider has accused a woman of breaking his Meta smart glasses. She was later hailed as a hero.

  • logging_strict@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    luigi never said that ;-)

    Check your device it’s obviously been hijacked. Totally uncredible you would have written such a comment.

    And you’re welcome

    • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      my pc is NOT even hijacked. that said, i think that if this were a socialist country, we WOULDN’T have any ai-enabled smart glasses that have cameras. seriously!

      • logging_strict@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Meta is funded by govt. A Canadian company created the original tech. A UK bootlicking socialist country of yes men.

        Most open source software coders form foundations hoping to attract gov’t funding.

        So tell me again how socialism had nothing to do with why/how these glasses came into being.

        • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          what i’m saying is that under socialism, we should NOT rely on privacy-invading surveillance a lot - these smart glasses would probably lead to mass surveillance use. seriously!

          • logging_strict@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Wait a sec! Why wouldn’t socialism rely on privacy-invading surveillance? They’d even be more inclined even after getting caught and told no.

            From govts POV, The People are not making sufficient efforts, to protect our own privacy so it’s not a problem.

            Gov’t corps will do whatever they can get away with. We live under “Rule of Lawyerism”, not “Rule of law”.

            Unfortunately we need to make efforts to protect ourselves rather than continue not protecting ourselves.

            The State will never protect you nor does it represent you. We are just marks.