• OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 day ago

    Their motivation is staying away from open platforms, and protecting their members’ IP rights. Gotta thwart those pirates.

    AMD is nearly 100x the size of Valve, and they couldn’t get HDMI 2.1 approval on Linux. Nvidia somewhat has it with their proprietary drivers, but not nouveau.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re not fucking with AMD and Valve just because they spontaneously developed an irrational hatred of partly-open platforms. Somebody has persuaded them that they have a financial incentive to do it.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        1 day ago

        The movie studios. As the person above said, the HDMI consortium (owned by movie studios) is focused on protecting their members IP rights from pirates. HDMI has built in DRM, that could be removed from an open source driver.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Well, one of the master keys leaked about 15 years back. A researcher posted a paper back in 2003 or so that outlined a method of finding a master key that was likely used by the people who made the release. It was a fun time to be on the internet, the people came together and said, yeah fuck those corpos and everyone reposted the key to every form of social media possible. I knew someone with the key tattooed on their arm (as part of their piracy themed artwork, I used to have pictures)

            Now, that particular master key was patched out with a compatibility breaking upgrade, specifically 2.1 of the standard, which was proven to be broken in 2012, but there was less coming together to share it the second time, or the third for 2.2 of the standard.

            But yes, if you wanted to code your own, you easily could. Just don’t share it or the sue happy corpos will come knocking.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe it is the movie studios, but there don’t appear to be any of them on the list of HDMI Forum members, or on its board of directors. So my first guess was some combination of Microsoft, Nvidia, Sony, and Apple. Whoever it is though, the question is how they went about convincing the HDMI Forum as a whole to take such a self-destructive approach.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            The HDMI founders were Hitachi, Matsushita (now Panasonic), Maxell, Philips, Silicon Image (now Lattice Semiconductor), Sony, Thomson (now Vantiva), and Toshiba.[3] Intel contributed the HDCP copy protection system.[4] The new format won the support of motion picture studios Fox, Universal, Warner Bros. and Disney, along with content distributors DirecTV, EchoStar (Dish Network) and CableLabs.[2]

            While Sony is a technology company, they’re also a very sue happy IP holder through Sony pictures and Playstation.

            Sony continues to be a major player on the HDMI forum.

      • entwine@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I haveb’t looked into this particular group, but usually it’s patents. Someone owns a patent for the tech required to implement the standard, and they “license” it out to anyone who wants to implement that standard. Obviously, they won’t agree to terms that hurt their ability to collect rent on their patent. Qualcomm is famously guilty of this in the modem space.

        Does that seem stupid, to adopt an industry standard that requires patented technology to implement? That’s because it is, and were we a sane society we would invalidate any patents that become an industry standard, but we’re a bunch of idiots with a billionaire cuck fetish.