Teknevra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to QueerDefenseFront@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agoZohran Mamdani wants NYC to be 'LGBTQ+ sanctuary' as he details big planswww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1284arrow-down12
arrow-up1282arrow-down1external-linkZohran Mamdani wants NYC to be 'LGBTQ+ sanctuary' as he details big planswww.thepinknews.comTeknevra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to QueerDefenseFront@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squareImADifferentBird@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·20 hours agoThat’s not an ad hominem.
minus-squarenotsure@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·18 hours agoad hominem /hŏm′ə-nĕm″, -nəm/ adjective Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument.
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-216 hours agoyes they’re attacking your argument and position as incoherent because of the use of language, terms and punctuation render it unintelligible, not because of who you are as a person.
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 hours agowhich they didn’t do. they said they didn’t understand you, explained why they didn’t understand, and then asked that you either explain or restate. you abusing the definition of ad hominem seems like a gish gallop
minus-squarenotsure@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·18 hours ago…you seem to fit the definition…
That’s not an ad hominem.
ad hominem /hŏm′ə-nĕm″, -nəm/ adjective
yes they’re attacking your argument and position as incoherent because of the use of language, terms and punctuation render it unintelligible, not because of who you are as a person.
which they didn’t do. they said they didn’t understand you, explained why they didn’t understand, and then asked that you either explain or restate.
you abusing the definition of ad hominem seems like a gish gallop
…you seem to fit the definition…
…what is?..