• undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You claim communism is impossible to implement yet you have no issue in attempting to implement a democracy that capitalism won’t be able to pervert, despite one never having existed before and it being impossible for one to exist.

    It sounds less like genuine rationality and more like rationalising a status quo bias. Even worse when people are claiming capitalism to be the natural order of life, despite existing for less than 0.0000001% of it and humans being egalitarian for far longer than they were capitalist.

    Peak homoeconomus experiencing “capitalist realism.” They even colonised your dreams.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yes, capitalism as a formal economic system is recent but the behaviours it’s built on aren’t. Competition, territorial control, hoarding for security, unequal outcomes all of these exist across nature (including humans). Lions fight for dominance, trees compete for sunlight, squirrels hoard food. Resource competition is older than any ideology.

      Communism, on the other hand, assumes sustained large scale human cooperation without hierarchy, which has never existed stably either outside small tribes where scarcity was low and populations small. Scaling that to millions is where it collapses.

      I’m not defending status quo. I support regulated capitalism with social welfare (centre-left). Capitalism needs checks, not abolition. Meanwhile Communism needs human behaviour to fundamentally change.

      One system builds on instinct and incentives and the other demands we override them entirely.

      That’s the difference in feasibility.