• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Oh absolutely! But why not more?

      Why are scientists around the globe competing for small chunks of time on the jwst when we could have several more telescopes like it? Or perhaps even a few slightly less advanced telescopes. I know designing it was a huge challenge, but even with the design complete, just constructing it presented a number of serious challenges. Given that the jwst was such a complex project, I wonder if a series of telescopes with optics and instruments still significantly more modern than Hubble would still be useful to astronomers as well as much easier to produce than the jwst.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Because learning about the universe is unlikely to have any short-term gains for people making budget decisions on this scale

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think that’s probably right. But personally, I want more and I think it’s worth caring about, worth encouraging people to think about.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I have models of both Hubble and Chandra telescopes hanging in my room. 😃

        It’s a great telescope, it made a whole slew of discoveries possible. But yeah, digital imaging has improved a lot over the last 27 years, do you remember what digital cameras were like in 1998?

        What we have is great, and what we’ve managed to do with it is astonishing. But… I believe we are doing ourselves a disservice by not updating these space observatories more frequently and by not building enough of them for all of the observations we want to make. Because we could, but we aren’t.