What exactly is the point of rolling release? My pc (well, the cpu) is 15 years old, I dont need bleeding edge updates. Or is it for security ?

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stable will still get security patches and bug updates, just no new major kernel jumps or new features.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Many smaller projects not explicitly supported by the vendor only make new releases and don’t also maintain a stable version.

    • nyan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      . . . until something in the stack requires a significant kernel upgrade, and then you’re stuck.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s a very odd example to choose given how trivially interchangable kernels are.

        At NixOS, we ship the same set of kernels on stable and rolling; the only potential difference being the default choice.
        I’m pretty sure most other stable distros optionally ship newer kernels too. There isn’t really a technical reason why they couldn’t.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, it is helpful for corporate applications, where nothing can introduce possible behavioural changes, that affect users, program function or the application development.