hello everyone - you may know me as @[email protected]. just recently, i got banned from hexbear for “history of repeating US state department talking points, anti-socialism and zionism”, as well as possible “fedposting”.

let me clarify that although i strongly support socialism and the ideas of liberating people from their corporate overlords, i am still learning about this. if anything that i’ve said on hexbear are considered “us state department talking points”, as well as “antisocialism”, “zionism” and even “fedposting” by the hexbear mods in any way, i sincerely apologize.

i personally disagree with stalinism, i mostly prefer the more libertarian forms of communism (like council communism, for example), but i’m open to hearing any and all perspectives from all parts of the socialist spectrum, whether it be marxism, leninism, stalinism/marxism-leninism, trotskyism, de leonism, social democracy, democratic socialism, georgism, libertarian socialism, market socialism, syndicalism, anarcho-communism, and even maoism and the likes.

i myself support a fusion of left-libertarianism, market socialism, georgism and de leonism. i’m also NOT a federal agent, i do NOT intend on entrapping people, and i oppose the actions of ice agents, as they are using force.

to any hexbear admin or mod, i apologize for any comment that i’ve made that can be seen as “repeating US state department talking points, antisocialism and zionism”

i really hope this clears that up.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The DPRK is “authoritarian” against capitalists and landlords, and is incredibly demonized by the west. China having markets does not make it state capitalism, state capitalism refers to economies where private ownership is the principle aspect and the state dominated by capitalists, with strong state control over the economy. China is socialist.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There isn’t one. The Kims are revered due to the role Kim Ik Sung played in kicking out the Japanese imperialists and leading the WPK, but that isn’t wrong or a sign of anything nefarious. That’s like asking about the cult of personality around the Clinton family or Bush family.

        • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          i think the reason why north koreans were crying over the deaths of kim il-sung and kim jong-il is simply because they were forced to, i think

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            This is wrong, though. People from the DPRK cried all over the world like in China, and were observed to be doing so, or generally were quite sad. They weren’t forced at gunpoint to cry.

            • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              i’m NOT even sure about that. maybe they weren’t actually forced at gunpoint, but even if they’re NOT forced, something about that feels a lot like being forced to cry. maybe they cried out of loyalty to the kim family (equivalent to a monarch), perhaps?

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                No? You have a very chauvanistic view of the DPRK, there’s a lot of good material you can read on them that will help paint a better picture for you.

                • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  if any of my comments seems very biased against the dprk in any way, shape and form, i sincerely apologize. that said, do you have any links?

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Absolutely. Nodutdol’s Korea Education Toolkit is comprehensive, and is an excellent way to get a deeper understanding. Nodutdol is an anti-imperialist group of Korean ex-pats that seek reunification, and to do so they seek an end to sanctions on the DPRK and the US Empire off the peninsula.

                    One of my personal favorite anti-imperialist podcasts is Blowback. Season 3 goes over the Korean War, but if you love podcasts, I recommend listening from season 1, the Iraq War. Doing so will help give you a comprehensive look into how the US Empire works overseas.

                    I also recommend the Prolewiki articles on Korea, the DPRK, and the ROK for a Marxist-Leninist perspective. The article on juche is also quite good, in my opinion. There’s also the article South Korea was Created from Thin Air by US Generals.

                    Overall, Nodutdol’s list is more than plenty to get a good idea of why we shouldn’t demonize the DPRK, and should instead push for an end to the US Empire’s aggression towards it. I’ll throw in my intro Marxist-Leninist reading list for good measure. You don’t need to be an ML to oppose imperialism against the DPRK, but it’s still helpful for understanding the DPRK’s position and the stances they take.

        • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago
          1. there is democracy, NOT “autocracy”: north korea did have multiple political parties such as a social democratic party and even a buddhist party, but those parties are in a coalition called the “Fatherland front”

          2. i said “cult of personality” because they treat the kim family (including current supreme leader kim jong-un) as if they were royalty - i think choe ryong-hae (the chair of the presidium) should’ve stayed recognized as the head of state after 2019, and he can be recognized as real royalty. seriously!

          • Dirt_Possum [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Are you making these points as arguments with me or with the table of contents on the article I linked that you didn’t read? Because I didn’t make any claims, I just quoted the section titles to make it clear the link was directly answering the exact question you asked Cowbee.

              • Dirt_Possum [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                57 minutes ago
                1. then why are you arguing with me? You’re not arguing with the article because it’s clear you didn’t read it.
                2. wut. If you’re asking me to link it again, ok, here but it’s the same link you can click on if you scroll up 4 comments above this one.