This is all IIRC, so dont crucify me if i misquote.
Something i saw being reported on recently (ABC Australia) was that while products can be tracked with shrinkflation by price per 100g, and they are looking at bringing in legislation to have this displayed if packaged sizes have changed (ie a 550g box is now a 475g box), they also note that manufacturors can change the amounts of ingredients and theres no way of telling which ir how much. They said factors include ingredient availability and supply cost increases, which are unavoidable in production, but also you cant tell if its just because they added more of a cheaper filler - or if they substituted it for a different thing completely.
The thing they were getting at is that shrinkflation is shady and scummy, but more scummy if dropping the nutritional content of a product because its cheaper to make and profit margins are bigger is much worse.
This is all IIRC, so dont crucify me if i misquote.
Something i saw being reported on recently (ABC Australia) was that while products can be tracked with shrinkflation by price per 100g, and they are looking at bringing in legislation to have this displayed if packaged sizes have changed (ie a 550g box is now a 475g box), they also note that manufacturors can change the amounts of ingredients and theres no way of telling which ir how much. They said factors include ingredient availability and supply cost increases, which are unavoidable in production, but also you cant tell if its just because they added more of a cheaper filler - or if they substituted it for a different thing completely.
The thing they were getting at is that shrinkflation is shady and scummy, but more scummy if dropping the nutritional content of a product because its cheaper to make and profit margins are bigger is much worse.
Damn that sounds like much needed legislation. Zero chance of that happening in the US.